agena for filing within ten ays/nights
revise counterclaims an cross claims
revise answer
affirmative efense memo on unclean hans
ste 1;
o the revise for election boar case
ste 2
o the revise for h an h case.
gt's letters and notes
notes and drafts of letters
Saturday, July 21, 2018
Thursday, July 19, 2018
No claim under the Indiana Constitution can be maintained under the circumstances
identified by Stewart, because the persuasive authority is that there is no private cause of
action for damages under the Indiana Constitution. See Estate of O’Bryan v. Town of
Sellersburg, 2004 WL 1234215 at *21 (S.D.Ind. May 20, 2004); Malone v. Becher, 2003 WL
22080737 at *18 (S.D.Ind. Aug. 29, 2003) (Indiana Supreme Court has not recognized an
implied right of action for damages under Article 1, sections 15 and 16); Boczar v. Kingen,
2000 WL 1137713 at *24-25 (S.D.Ind. March 9, 2000); Ratliff v. Cohn, 693 N.E.2d 530, 542
(Ind. 1998) (“particularized, individual applications are not reviewable under Article 1,
Section 18 because Section 18 applies to the penal code as a whole and does not protect
fact-specific challenges.”) (emphasis in original); Bailey v. Washington Theater Co., 34
N.E.2d 17, 19-20 (Ind. 1941).
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-insd-1_06-cv-00923/pdf/USCOURTS-insd-1_06-cv-00923-0.pdf
i/in't;
thursay went to bank.sent 3 emails.
wenesay
nothing. trash. trash.
wait wes visited the governor and the isp. visited tax office.
other bank/ chase, was overrawn, but that was tuesay/
wenesay bible stuy. no boy scouts.
sunay church.
tuesay ick u trash.
thurs
withrew 1111
i worke on briefs
to o
call mom.
to o